Markus Schmidt, Europe region analyst at Worldwise Analytica

Markus Schmidt

Analyzing Today, Anticipating Tomorrow

Europe Faces Trade Frictions, Energy Crises, and Political Fragmentation Amid Strategic Shifts in Ukraine and the Arctic

Trump's escalating tariff threats underscore Europe's economic vulnerabilities, exposing the fragility of its export-dependent economies. Germany, France, and Italy are particularly at risk as the U.S. seeks to leverage trade imbalances to extract economic concessions. Beyond immediate economic impacts, Trump's protectionist stance challenges Europe's ability to project influence in a shifting global trade landscape. To counter this, the EU must reinforce its strategic autonomy by accelerating intra-European trade, fostering innovation-driven industries, and pursuing trade diversification with regions like Latin America and Asia.

Energy security emerges as Europe's Achilles' heel, with disputes over gas transit through Ukraine and Transdniestria highlighting the EU's continued reliance on Russian energy. These challenges reveal not just immediate vulnerabilities but also the geopolitical leverage Moscow retains. While green energy initiatives, such as Ukraine's wind farm expansion, offer long-term solutions, their feasibility hinges on substantial EU financial and technical backing. Europe's energy resilience will depend on accelerated diversification, infrastructure connectivity, and deeper coordination among member states.

The Ukraine conflict takes on a dangerous strategic dimension, as Kyiv employs precision drone strikes against Russian industrial and energy hubs. These attacks, while showcasing Ukraine's evolving operational capabilities, risk provoking a severe Russian response targeting critical European interests. Moreover, North Korea's and Iran's deeper involvement in supporting Moscow indicates the growing internationalization of the conflict. NATO and the EU must adopt a dual strategy: providing Ukraine with advanced weaponry and economic support while preparing for potential escalation scenarios that could destabilize the broader region.

Migration debates highlight Europe's political fragmentation, with Germany's internal discourse exposing deep divisions ahead of its February elections. Friedrich Merz's CDU reliance on far-right rhetoric and the AfD's growing influence signal risks to democratic norms and the EU's broader migration policies. The EU must address migration at its roots through development-focused partnerships with source countries while reinforcing border security and equitable resettlement mechanisms to counter the rise of anti-migration populism.

Governance erosion across Europe threatens democratic cohesion, with Austria's Freedom Party undermining press freedoms and Slovakia accused of centralizing power. Such trends risk further polarization within the EU, weakening its ability to enforce rule-of-law standards. Brussels must expand mechanisms to monitor and penalize member states that deviate from democratic norms while fostering dialogue to address underlying socio-economic grievances driving populism.

Arctic geopolitics represent a neglected but urgent priority for Europe, as the U.S. and Russia assert dominance in the region. Denmark's limited Arctic defense strategy exposes gaps in Europe's ability to safeguard Greenland and assert influence over Arctic resources and transit routes. Europe's inaction risks ceding strategic ground to external actors, necessitating the swift creation of an EU Arctic policy that balances sovereignty, environmental priorities, and defense integration.

Belarus signals an opportunistic balancing act, with Lukashenko's selective prisoner releases ahead of elections aimed at alleviating Western sanctions. These gestures are unlikely to reflect genuine reform but instead highlight the tactical maneuvering of autocratic regimes under pressure. The EU must remain firm on structural reforms in Belarus while leveraging sanctions to incentivize meaningful changes that reduce Moscow's influence in the region.

Economic signals remain mixed, with Germany's tentative stabilization in its private sector offset by persistent challenges in manufacturing. Trump's tariff threats exacerbate uncertainty, underscoring the need for proactive EU industrial policies that focus on resilience and innovation. Simultaneously, the EU-Mexico trade agreement provides a rare bright spot in Europe's diversification strategy, though broader efforts are needed to secure supply chains and mitigate global trade disruptions.

In conclusion, Europe's geopolitical landscape is defined by intersecting crises that demand a multidimensional response. Enhanced EU-NATO collaboration, a focus on strategic autonomy, and a commitment to addressing governance and energy vulnerabilities will be critical for Europe to navigate this volatile period effectively.

Geopolitical Risk Assessment for the Europe
(24-01-2025)

Europe faces escalating challenges as internal political fragmentation intersects with external geopolitical pressures. U.S. trade protectionism, Arctic rivalries, energy vulnerabilities, and Ukraine's conflict escalation highlight the need for robust EU strategic autonomy. Additionally, governance crises, migration debates, and the risk of economic stagnation threaten long-term European cohesion and stability.

Geopolitical Risk Index

Developments to Follow for the Europe (See All Global)